Archive for May, 2007

Iraq Occupation Update

The Americans are spending a fortune building a wall to enforce sectarian divisions. The people don’t want the wall. It represents the final breakdown of civility. It reflects the Palestinian wall which creates a prison.
Muqtada Al Sadr is in hiding because the Americans are looking out to arrest him. He has repeatedly called for his militias to cease attacking other Iraqis and turn on the occupiers. Of course, from our standpoint this doesn’t seem very friendly, but from the standpoint of a united Iraq, it is actually a relatively constructive initiative. He has also been negotiating with Sunni leaders behind the scenes in an attempt to create a united front for Iraq. Read the rest of this entry »

Comments

Press -spectives

Today on “The Journal” from Deutch Welle, they covered some of the current Palestinian upheaval. They then said that kassan rockets were fired into Israel damaging a house and wounding a couple of people – no mention of how badly they were wounded. They said that the group that took responsibility for the rocket attack said that it was in honor of the ‘Nakba’. They then explained that ‘Nakba’ is what Palestinians call Israeli Independence day. They said this in an informational tone with no further explanation.

There was no mention of the fact that ‘nakba’ means ‘catastrophe’, and, to the Palestinians, the ‘Nakba’ commemorates the catastophic loss of their homeland. It commemorates a time when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were driven from their homes and lands by the Israeli army, never to return. They didn’t mention the descendants of these people who still live, in many cases, in refugee camps and in the occupied territories, nor the fact that Israeli immigrants and their descendents inhabit those homes and that property to this day.

You can watch “The Journal” from Deutch Welle on LinkTV. If you to have an idea of how the Palestinians view the internal strife, and how they perceive ‘Al Nakba’, watch today’s episode of ‘Mosaic’, also on LinkTV on Satellite and online.

Comments

Clarification of remarks about Iran and the IAEA

A friend mentioned to me, after reading the Iran Talking points below, that they did not entirely understand what I meant. I realize that I had not stated the points about Iran’s relationship with the IAEA Very clearly. So, here is a clarification.

“IAEA” stands for the International Atomic Energy Agency. They are an agency of the United Nations with oversight over international nuclear policy, and in particular, they deal with issues related to nuclear non-proliferation and the International Non-Proliferation Treaty. In signing the treaty, nations state that, if they don’t already have nuclear weapons, they won’t develop them, and if they do have them, they will not build any new ones, will, over time, reduce their current stockpiles of nukes. In return, the IAEA will help nations to develop nuclear power for peaceful purposes

The US is a signatory of the treaty, but it refuses to reduce it’s store of nukes, and is making plans to build new ones. The US also rejects IAEA oversite on our nuclear activities. Therefore, the US is in violation of their treaty obligations under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel, all have acquired nuclear weapons illegally, but none are signatories of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. Therefore, they don’t come under IAEA scrutinty, and cannot be in violation of a treaty they never signed.

*** Iran is also a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Apparently, they did begin clandestine nuclear research back in the 90′s. However, the did eventually emerge, and for all of this decade (at least), they have been working closely with the IAEA, have been allowing the required inspections, and have been getting reasonably good grades from the IAEA for their cooperation with the process. This behavior would tend to support their consistent assertion that they want the nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.

The US has been adamant in trying to stop Iran from having any Nuclear Technology at all. The EU attempted to forestall US initiatives a few years ago by making an agreement with Iran giving them beneficial trade and political advantages if they suspend their Nuclear Enrichment program. However, the US refused to support this treaty, and continued to press for sanctions and even attacks on Iran. So, Iran backed out of the agreement, but continued with the IAEA.

Russian, China and the EU all have significant energy investments in Iran. Russia is currently building a nuclear power plant in Iran. They offered to provide the enriched Uranium if Iran would desist from enrichment activities, but Iran rejected the offer. After the US raised the issue of sanctions at the UN, Russia has suspended work on the power plant. Iran persisted with their enrichment activities and their inspection schedule with the IAEA.

Finally, The sanctions were enacted by the UN Security Council this spring. Iran was told to cease all Nuclear development “or else”. Unfortunately, the IAEA, as the United Nations Nuclear oversight agency must now judge Iran in relation to compliance with this new demand rather than with the standard of “compliance with Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty requirements”. Iran rejects the Security Council Resolution. Since Iran is determined to continue it’s nuclear development program, this means that there is no longer any way for them to be in compliance with IAEA requirements. So, they had on choice but to drop out of the inspection program.

** Iran is determined to continue their nuclear development program. They repeat their insistence that this is their right regularly. They have faced down all manner of threats over this. At the same time, they have initiated talks with the IAEA in an attempt to restore their relationship and resume the inspection process so they can stay on the up an up with the international community and honor their treaty obligations. Meanwhile Dick Cheney is touring the Middle East calling for an attack on Iran.

The US has caused a situation which achieves the opposite of our stated goal. Instead of drawing Iran into the world community where incentives and peer pressure can be used to assure Iran’s continued commitment to use nuclear power only for peaceful purpose, we are driving her out. Iran wants badly to be a member of the world community, but not at the cost of being treated with contempt by the main player. Iran wants respect from the world community and is acting in what they think is a manner of dignity and self respect.

*** If you want footnotes to back up what I have said here, read the previous post.

** According to IRIB News in Iran, negotiations with the IAEA have been fruitful and IAEA inspections of Iran’s Nuclear Program have resumed.

Comments

Iran talking points revisited

Here are the points I made earlier with regard to the perverse absurdity of attacking Iran, with links to sources that validate them. The links are useful because so many people find the truth difficult to accept, perhaps because most people are continuously bombarded with distortions of fact and outright falsehoods about Iran and the rest of the Middle East by the mainstream press.

Regardless of Iran’s worthiness for our tolerance and respect (which I think is considerable) I suppose that it is enough that to attack an innocent people who have been through great suffering already in the last few decades, in part due to western meddling , and who present no immediate threat to us, would be a terrible crime. Taking a more pragmatic view, the destruction of Iran would cause a severe worldwide economic depression leading, most likely, to a third world war. We don’t currently buy oil or gas from Iran, but much of Europe and Russia do, and the Chinese have deals in the works as well. I guess it takes little more than common sense to see that much.

However, it is good to have responses to the unending litany of Iran’s crimes, to the justifications that might be taken to make such an act seem sane.  Read the rest of this entry »

Comments

Twins

Wednesday on Mosaic News, there was footage and commentary from Al Jazeera of the IDF disrupting a peaceful May Day protest by Palestinians with bullets and cannisters of teargas[1]. The next day Democracy Now had footage and commentary on a similar situation where LA police in riot gear disrupted a peaceful May Day protest in MacArthur Park with bullets and tear gas cannisters[2][3]. In both instances the victims are unarmed civilians demonstrating for workers rights on the internationally designated day for such demonstrations.

Both scenes caused a knot in my chest and unbidden tears to come to my eyes. It is a physical reaction, and though it may be sympathy and compassion. Certainly I feel those emotions ongoing. But, it is also fear. Here is the rule of law derailed. This is what happens to the socially inconvenient and social underclasses in our so-called democratic societies when the have the temerity to raise an unsanctioned request. When will it be my turn? Or yours?

Comments